Prompts
A prompt is a message template the user picks.
Tools are for the model. A prompt is the opposite: the user chooses one from a menu in their client (a slash command, a button), fills in its arguments, and the rendered messages go into the conversation as if they had typed them.
You declare one by putting @mcp.prompt() on a function that returns the text.
Your first prompt
from mcp.server import MCPServer
mcp = MCPServer("Code Helper")
@mcp.prompt()
def review_code(code: str) -> str:
"""Review a piece of code."""
return f"Please review this code:\n\n{code}"
The SDK reads the same three things it read from your tools:
- The name is the function name:
review_code. - The description the client shows is the docstring:
Review a piece of code. - The arguments come from the parameters.
codehas no default, so it's required.
That is what a client gets back from prompts/list:
{
"name": "review_code",
"description": "Review a piece of code.",
"arguments": [
{"name": "code", "required": true}
]
}
There is no JSON Schema here. Prompt arguments are a flat list of named string values: a form a person fills in, not a payload a model constructs.
Rendering it
The client renders the template with prompts/get, passing the arguments. Your function runs and the str you return becomes one user message:
{
"description": "Review a piece of code.",
"messages": [
{
"role": "user",
"content": {
"type": "text",
"text": "Please review this code:\n\ndef add(a, b): return a + b"
}
}
],
"resultType": "complete"
}
That is the entire life of a prompt: listed by name, rendered on demand, dropped into the chat.
Check
required is enforced before your function runs. Render review_code without code and the
request itself fails with a JSON-RPC error (code -32603):
mcp.shared.exceptions.MCPError: Internal server error
There is no tool-style error result to hand back to a model, because no model is in the loop:
the call raises. The reason (Missing required arguments: {'code'}) lands in your server's log.
Try it
Run the server with the MCP Inspector:
uv run mcp dev server.py
Open the Prompts tab and select review_code. The Inspector draws a form with one required code field. Fill it in, render it, and you get back exactly the user message above.
More than one message
A code review is one message. A debugging session is a conversation, and a prompt can seed the whole thing.
Return a list of messages instead of a str:
from mcp.server import MCPServer
from mcp.server.mcpserver.prompts.base import AssistantMessage, Message, UserMessage
mcp = MCPServer("Code Helper")
@mcp.prompt()
def review_code(code: str) -> str:
"""Review a piece of code."""
return f"Please review this code:\n\n{code}"
@mcp.prompt()
def debug_error(error: str) -> list[Message]:
"""Start a debugging conversation."""
return [
UserMessage("I'm seeing this error:"),
UserMessage(error),
AssistantMessage("I'll help debug that. What have you tried so far?"),
]
UserMessageandAssistantMessagecome frommcp.server.mcpserver.prompts.base. Hand them astrand they wrap it inTextContentfor you. The role is the class name.Messageis their common base. Use it as the return annotation.
Rendering debug_error now produces three messages, in order:
{
"description": "Start a debugging conversation.",
"messages": [
{"role": "user", "content": {"type": "text", "text": "I'm seeing this error:"}},
{"role": "user", "content": {"type": "text", "text": "TypeError: 'int' object is not iterable"}},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": {"type": "text", "text": "I'll help debug that. What have you tried so far?"}
}
],
"resultType": "complete"
}
Notice the last one. Pre-filling an assistant turn is how you steer the model's next reply without making the user type the steering themselves.
Titles and argument descriptions
review_code is a function name, not a label. Give the client something better to put on the button, and describe each argument so the form explains itself:
from typing import Annotated
from pydantic import Field
from mcp.server import MCPServer
mcp = MCPServer("Code Helper")
@mcp.prompt(title="Code review")
def review_code(
code: Annotated[str, Field(description="The code to review.")],
language: Annotated[str, Field(description="The language the code is written in.")] = "python",
) -> str:
"""Review a piece of code."""
return f"Please review this {language} code:\n\n{code}"
title="Code review"is the human-readable name, exactly like a tool'stitle.Annotated[str, Field(description=...)]is the same pattern you used in Tools. Here the description lands on the argument instead of in a schema.languagehas a default, so it stops being required.
The prompts/list entry now carries everything a client needs to draw a good form:
{
"name": "review_code",
"title": "Code review",
"description": "Review a piece of code.",
"arguments": [
{"name": "code", "description": "The code to review.", "required": true},
{"name": "language", "description": "The language the code is written in.", "required": false}
]
}
Info
If you have read Tools, you already know everything on this page. Same decorator, same
docstring-as-description, same Annotated/Field. The only things that change are who
triggers it (the user) and where the result goes (into the conversation).
Recap
@mcp.prompt()on a function makes it a prompt. Name from the function, description from the docstring.- Prompts are user-controlled: the client lists them, the user picks one and fills in the arguments.
- Arguments are a flat list of named strings (no schema). A parameter with a default is optional.
- Return a
strand it becomes one user message. Return a list ofUserMessage/AssistantMessageto seed a multi-turn conversation. title=andField(description=...)are what a client puts in its UI.- A missing required argument fails the whole request. There is no per-prompt error result.
Next up: the one extra parameter a tool, resource or prompt can ask the SDK for, The Context.